Witness and beyond

It seems to me that the distress on the left over Trump’s election derives from some sort of corrupted moral witness thinking.  The moral witness sees and tells the truth, in spite of cost.  This person therefore acquires moral authority.  An ‘If A then B’ statement.  The corruption enters when others agree with the witness, then assume the presumed mantle of moral authority, then extends that presumed authority to judge.  Perhaps I misunderstand the moral witness concept.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s